2b The Economic Role of Government and Government Finance |
III. Review: Capitalism, Markets, and Efficiency
A. Capitalism and Limited Government
- private property and economic growth
- markets and prices
- role of self interest
- freedom of enterprise and choice
- competition = capitalism
- limited role for government
B. Why limited government?
Pure Capitalism and the Market System:
The Market and the 5 EsCharacteristics of a Market Economy (Capitalism)
A. private property
B. markets and prices
C. role of self interest: incentives
D. freedom of enterprise and choice
E. competition1. large numbers
2. free entry and exit
3. produce standardized productsF. limited role for government
The Market and the 5Es
1. Economic GrowthCapitalist economies tend to have more rapid rates of growth2. Allocative Efficiency: Producing what consumers want
a. Capitalism and incentives(1) more profits = produce more(2) losses = produce less
(3) consumer sovereignty and "dollar votes"
b. Capitalism tends to achieves allocative efficiency
3. Productive Efficiency: Producing at a minimum cost
a. Capitalism and incentives(1) profits = total revenues - total cost(2) minimizing costs means more profits
b. Capitalism tends to achieve productive efficiency
4. Equity
There is no characteristic of capitalism which will guarantee equityOften, the government gets involved to help achieve equity
5. Full Employment
Economists disagree over whether capitalism will result in full employment
- Some say yes, and if there is unemployment it is usually caused by government interference
- Some say no, and at times government involvement is needed to move the economy towards full employment
IV. Economic Functions of Government
A. Five Reasons for Government Involvement1. legal and social framework
2. maintaining competition
3. redistribution of income
(correcting market failure to achieve equity)
4. reallocation of resources
(correcting market failure to achieve efficiency)
5. stabilizing unemployment and inflation and promoting economic growthproviding the legal foundation and a social environment conducive to the effective operation of the market system1. review competitiona. large numbers
b. free entry and exit2. the problem with monopolies
a. higher prices
b. smaller quantities
C. allocative and productive inefficiency3. role of government
a. preventing monopolies -- antitrust laws
b. regulating monopolies -- natural monopoliesD. Correcting Market Failure to Achieve Equity
1. define equity
2. how does equity affect society's satisfaction?
3. examples of income distributionUS: Table
World:4. Growing inequality in the US
- BBC News Article: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-24039202
- 30 minute interview with Robert Reich: http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/robert-reich-jacob-kornbluth-inequality-for-all-/521d105b78c90a630700013e
5. role of government
a. transfer payments
b. market intervention
c. progressive income taxesE. Correcting Market Failure to Achieve Allocative Efficiency
Four circumstances (there are more) when a market economy results in allocative inefficiency:
- Lack of Competition (Microeconomics class)
- Negative Externalities
- Positive Externalities
- Public goods
F. Stabilization (to be studied in units 2 and 3)
1. unemployment
2. inflation
3. role of governmenta. fiscal policy
b. monetary policy
V. Government Finance
I. Federal FinanceA. Federal Expenditures
2009![]()
1. pensions and income security
2. national defense
3. health
4. interest on the public debt
5. other
B. Federal Tax Revenues
2009
1. personal income tax
2. payroll taxes
3. corporate income tax
4. excise taxesC. State and Local Finance
1. state expenditures and receipts [staexp.gif /starev.gif / 2007exp / 2007rev]
2. local expenditures an receipts [locexp.gif / locrev.gif / 2007exp / 2007rev ]D. Regressive, Proportional, and Progressive Taxes
WASHINGTON
House Dems hit on sales tax proposal
House Democrats plan to attack GOP candidates nationwide on their support of a national sales tax proposal, hoping the issue will help their attempt to take over the House.
Democrats think a national sales tax would mean that lower-income families will pay more of the country's tax burden and have been running advertisements attacking GOP candidates for supporting the idea. "We think that Republican candidates and Republican incumbents who are supporting this legislation must respond to their constituents about how they're going to deal with moving the tax burden," said Rep. Robert Matsui, D-Calif.
From wire reports
Northwest Herald
Wed., Oct 27, 2004, page 3A
Logan Scott
Breckenridge
June 27, 2006Several friends have asked: "Why should we pay sales tax on lift tickets? I don't want to pay a $14 sales tax on my season pass. Don't we pay enough already?" Perhaps a better question would be: "How might we use the revenue?"
Summit County has a highly regressive tax structure in the form of its sales tax on food for home consumption, i.e. the tax we pay on groceries at the supermarket. In most states, such a tax is in fact illegal. According to the USDA, a budget minded family of four averages $153/week on groceries or $7,966/year. Our 5 percent groceries sales tax adds about $400 to that cost. For someone earning $10/hour, that is about one week's wages. Clearly, the sales tax on food places a disproportionate burden on the working poor who are the foundation of our tourist industry.
Imposing a 4 percent sales tax on lift tickets would provide a revenue stream that could be used to reduce or eliminate groceries tax while maintaining a neutral position on overall sales tax collections. A 4 percent sales tax on lift tickets would help shift the burden from those who can least afford it to those who can and help make Summit County a more family friendly place to live.
Other possible uses? How about funding affordable housing initiatives specifically earmarked for police, school teachers, firemen, and other persons vital to our community. Affordable daycare continues to be a major concern, especially with the impending loss of Kinderhut triggered by VRI actions. Do we really want to continue providing VRI with a free ride on sales taxes and 6.7 million dollar subsidies to build gondolas? I think not. It is time for a lift ticket tax.
http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20060627/LETTER/106270043&SearchID=73249722340253
E. Personal Income Tax
1. taxable income
2. progressive taxa. marginal tax rateshttp://economics.about.com/b/2012/11/26/a-friendly-reminder-about-marginal-tax-rates.htmb. average tax rates
3. Fed. Income Tax Rates
TAX SCHEDULE:
http://www.irs.gov/
For 2012, tax brackets are as follows for an individual in the U.S.:10% on taxable income from $0 to $8,70015% on taxable income over $8,700 to $35,350
25% on taxable income over $35,350 to $85,650
28% on taxable income over $85,650 to $178,650
33% on taxable income over $178,650 to $388,350
35% on taxable income over $388,350
E. International Comparisons
![]()
F. Distribution of the Tax Burden
- http://mercatus.org/publication/tax-burden-among-varying-income-percentiles
- http://www.ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html
G. Government Growth
1. ways to measure government size
2. growth of TOTAL government expenditures
3. BUT:
a. purchases vs. transfer payments
(exhaustive and nonexhaustive expenditures)much of the growth has been the growth of transfer payments
b. growth of government expenditures AS A % OF GDP
![]()
Notice how goverernment spending as a % of total spending DID NOT DOUBLE since 1965, but it is growing