Outline
I. Structural Adjustment Policies
1. Privatization
2. Promotion of Competition
3. Limited and Reoriented Role for Government
4. Price Reform: Removing Controls
5. Joining the World Economy
6. Macroeconomic Stability
II. Review: Capitalism, Markets, and Efficiency
A. Capitalism and Limited Government
- private property and economic growth
- markets and prices
- role of self interest
- freedom of enterprise and choice
- competition = capitalism
- limited role for government
B. Why limited government?
A. The Market System and Efficiency
See: The supply and demand model and allocative efficiency1. WHAT WE GET:a. Goal of businesses: Maximize Profits
b. Therefore,they will produce where:
- the Market Equilibrium quantity
- the quantity where Qs=Qd
- the is "what we get"
- Graphically:
c. Assumptions: pure capitalism (for what is capitalism see: chapter 2)
2. WHAT WE WANT: ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY
a.. Review :(1) Allocative Efficiencydefinition - using our limited resources to produce:
- The quantity of goods and services that maximizes society's satisfaction
- using resources to produce more CDs that people want and fewer cassette tapes that they don't want
- no shortages and no surpluses
(2) Benefit-Cost Analysis
definition -the selection of ALL possible alternatives where the marginal benefits are greater than the marginal costselect all where: MB > MC
up to where: MB = MC
but never where: MB < MCB. Allocative Efficiency is achieved where:
1. MSB=MSCa. define Marginal Social Benefits (MSB)b. define Marginal Social Costs (MSC)
c. therfore if society gets
all quantities where: MSB > MSC
up to where: MSB = MSC
but never where: MSB < MSCthis will be the quantity where society's Satisfaction will be maximized or the allocatively efficient quantity
2. Graphically:
C. THEREFORE:
1. Businesses will produce the profit maximizing or market equilibrium quantity - the quantity where Qd=Qs2. Society wants the allocatively efficient quantity - the quantity where MSB=MSC
3. WHAT WE GET = WHAT WE WANT if:
b. Market Demand = Marginal Social Benefits (D=MSB)1. law of diminishing marginal utility
2. assuming no positive externality (or spillover benefit)s D=MSBc. Market Supply = Marginal Social Costs (S=MSC)
1. law of increasing costs
2. assuming no negative externality (or spillover cost)s S=MSCD. Competitive Markets and Allocative Efficiency (MSB=MSC)
1. if there are no negative externality (or spillover cost)s, then S = MSC,2. if there are no positive externality (or spillover benefit)s, then D = MSB,
3. Graphically:
4. Then: WHAT WE GET = WHAT WE WANT and market economies achieve allocative efficiency
In a market economy with no positive externality (or spillover benefit)s and no negative externality (or spillover cost)s:
the profit maximizing or market equilibrium quantity
(what we get)WILL BE THE SAME AS
the allocative efficient quantity
(what we want)
III. Economic Functions of Government
A. Five Reasons for Government Involvement1. legal and social framework
2. maintaining competition
3. redistribution of income
(correcting market failure to achieve equity)
4. reallocation of resources
(correcting market failure to achieve efficiency)
5. stabilizing unemployment and inflation and promoting economic growthproviding the legal foundation and a social environment conducive to the effective operation of the market system1. review competitiona. large numbers
b. free entry and exit2. the problem with monopolies
a. higher prices
b. smaller quantities
C. allocative and productive inefficiency3. role of government
a. preventing monopolies -- antitrust laws
b. regulating monopolies -- natural monopoliesD. Correcting Market Failure to Achieve Equity
1. define equity
2. how does equity affect society's satisfaction?
3. examples of income distributionUS:http://www.census.gov/ftp/pub/hhes/income/histinc/h02.html
World:
4. role of government
a. transfer payments
b. market intervention
c. progressive income taxesE. Correcting Market Failure to Achieve Allocative Efficiency
Three Circumstances when a market economy results in allocative inefficiency
- Negative Externalities
- Positicve Externalities
- Public goods
1. Negative Externality (or spillover costs)
a. definitionTEXTBOOK: A cost imposed without compensation on third parties by the production or consumption of sellers or buyers.CLASS: A negative externality (or spillover cost) occurs if some of the costs of producing and consuming a product "spillover" onto a third party who does not benefit.
- not just the buyer
- not just the seller,
- but someone else must pay some of the costs of production
Example: A paper manufacturer dumps toxic chemicals into a river killing the fish sport fishers seek.
- buyer = purchaser of paper
- seller = paper manufacturer
- third party = people who fish, or live, downstream
b. examples
a) pollution
b) cigarettes
c) alcohol
d) gasoline and pollution
d) party in dorm room and you're not invitedc. markets and inefficiency:
ON A GRAPH SHOW:
1) S and D for a product2) MSC when there are NO negative externality (or spillover cost)s (producer pays ALL costs)
- Show the profit maximizing quantity
- Show the allocatively efficient quantity
(assume D=MSB, i.e. no positive externality (or spillover benefit)s)3) What happens to S if there ARE negative externality (or spillover cost)s (the producer can AVOID some costs)
4) What happens to P, Q, and efficiency WITH negative externality (or spillover cost)s?
- what happens to the profit maximizing P and Q? (Show on gragh)
- what is the allocatively efficient quantity? (Show on graph)
5) RESULT:
- Does the market achieve allocative efficiency when ther are negative externality (or spillover cost)s?
- Is there an OVERallocation of resources OR an UNDERallocation of resources?
- without the government would TOO NUCH or TOO LITTLE be produced?
d. correcting for negative externality (or spillover cost)s: What can the government do?
1) GOAL: to reduce production and get closer to the allocatively efficient quantity2) policies
- specific (excise) taxes on products with negative externality (or spillover cost)s
- legislation/regulation (Direct Controls)
- gov't sets the amount
- gov't decides who
e. APPLICATION: SHOULD GAS PRICES BE HIGHER?
Arguing the Upside of High Gas Prices
Morning Edition, September 22, 2005
One writer believes gas prices actually should be high. Steve Inskeep talks with James Surowiecki, a financial columnist for The New Yorker who says a 50-cent gas tax would make drivers pay for the real cost of cars on the road and make business cater to the fuel-conscious.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4858826
2. Positive Externalities (or spillover benefits)
a. definitionTEXTBOOK: A benefit obtained without compensation by third parties from the production or consumption of sellers or buyers.CLASS: A positive externality (or spillover benefit) occurs if some of the benefits of producing or consuming a product "spillover" onto a third party who does not have to pay
- not just the buyer
- not just the seller,
- but someone else benefits
Example: A beekeeper benefits when a neighboring farmer plants clover.
- buyer = purchaser of honey
- seller = beekeeper
- third party = neighboring farmer
b. examples
a) education
b) Ski Areas and Ski Shops
c) parksc. markets and inefficiency:
ON A GRAPH SHOW:
a) MSB and alloc eff. P and Q with NO positive externality (or spillover benefit)s
- what is the profit maximizing quantity?
- what is the allocatively efficient quantity?
b) What happens to D if there are positive externality (or spillover benefit)s and a consumer can benefit without paying?
c) So what happens to P, Q, and efficiency WITH positive externality (or spillover benefit)s?
- what is the profit maximizing quantity?
- what is the allocatively efficient quantity?
d) RESULT: an UNDERallocation of resources
- too little would be produced without the government
d. Correcting for positive externality (or spillover benefit)s - What can the government do?
1) GOAL: increase the quantity2) HOW?
- increase demand (subsidize consumers)
- increase supply (subsidize suppliers)
- provide goods via the government
a. definitionA good or service which is indivisible (nonrival;) and to which the exclusion principle does not apply1) exclusion principle does not apply
The exclusion principle is: The ability to exclude those who do not pay for a product from receiving its benefits.2) free-rider problem
because exclusion principle does not applyThe inability of potential providers of an economically desirable but indivisible good or service to obtain payment from those who benefit because the exclusion principle is not applicable.
3) indivisible good / nonrival
b. examples
1) lighthouse
2) national defense
3) immunizations
4) street lights
5) insect and flood controlc. markets and inefficiency
RESULT:
- an UNDERallocation of resources
- too little (none) will be produced without the government
d. role of government:
allocating resources to public goodse. Are the following public goods? If not why does the government provide them?
1) public education
2) public parks
3) public libraries
1. unemployment
2. inflation
3. role of governmenta. fiscal policy
b. monetary policy
IV. Government Finance
A. Federal Expenditures1. pensions and income security
2. national defense
3. health
4. interest on the public debt
5. otherB. Federal Tax Revenues
1. personal income tax
2. payroll taxes
3. corporate income tax
4. excise taxesC. State and Local Finance
1. state expenditures and receipts
2. local expenditures an receiptsD. Personal Income Tax
1. Fed. Income Tax Rates
http://www.irs.gov (search for "tax schedule")
TAX TABLE: http://www.irs.gov/prod/forms_pubs/graphics/10311g75.gif
TAX SCHEDULE: http://www.irs.gov/prod/forms_pubs/graphics/10311g87.gif
- marginal tax rates
- average tax rate
2. What is fair?
- Progressive tax
- Proportional tax
- Regressive tax
E. Government Growth
1. ways to measure government size
2. purchases vs. transfer payments
(exhaustive and nonexhaustive expenditures)
3. growth of government expendituresa. correcting for inflation
b. compared to other sectors
c. growth of transfer payments