TIMES NEW ROMANIn this lesson we also will begin our look at the role of the government in a market economy. This would be a good time to review chapter 2. In chapter 2 we learned that there is a limited role for government in market economies. We learned in lesson 3c that markets are efficient,

ARIAL so there is little need for the government. In this lesson we will see what happens if the government interferes in markets. We will learn that sometimes governments will set prices (price ceilings and price floors), rather than letting the market set the price. In

ARIAL TUR other words: SOMETIMES GOVERNMENTS CAUSE ALLOCATIVE INEFFICIENCY. (This is the plywood after a hurricane example discussed in the 5Es reading in lesson 1b.)

ARIAL UNICODE MS Then we will begin to look at examples of when the markets on their own fail to achieve allocative efficiency and examine what the government can do to correct these market failures. SOMETIMES MARKETS BY

CALIBRI THEMSELVES ARE INEFFICIENT and the government may try to modify the market to help it achieve allocative efficiency. There are three MARKET FAILURES that we will look at in chapter 5. A "market failure" occurs when the market fails to achieve allocative

CALIBRI LIGHT efficiency. In lesson 5a we look at the market failure caused by negative externalities - when the supply curve does not include all of the costs to society of producing and consuming the product. Then in lesson 5b we look at the market failures caused by positive externalities and public goods.

We will assume that businesses will always produce the profit maximizing quanitity since their goal is to maximize profits. The profit maximizing quantity is also the equilibrium

MICROSOFT SANS SERIF quantity that we studied in chapter 3, when the Qs = Qd. This is WHAT WE GET. We get whatever they produce and they will produce the quantity that gives them the biggest profits. The goal of business is not to be efficient. Their goal is to maximize their profits. If a business can make larger profits by being inefficient then they will be inefficient. Or if they can make larger profits by being efficient they they will be efficient. The main point is that efficiency is not their goal, rather, maximizing profits is their goal.

The allocatively efficient quantity is what society wants. We learned at the end of chapter 3 that allocative efficiency occurs at the quantity where MSB = MSC. This is WHAT WE WANT. We want to maximize our satisfaction and we learned in chapter one that this occurs when we achieve the 5 Es. Allocative efficiency is one of the 5 Es.

When the profit maximizing quantity equals the allocatively efficient quantity then markets are efficient . This means that profit maximizing businesses are producing the quantity that maximizes society"s satisfaction. WHAT WE GET = WHAT WE WANT. This is the INVISIBLE HAND of capitalism that was discussed in chapter 2. It's as if there is an invisible hand guiding businesses to not only make decisions that maximize their profits, but also to maximize society's satisfaction. As if they don't even know it is happening.

When markets fail to achieve allocative efficiency, the profit maximizing quantity (WHAT WE GET or the equilibrium quantity from chapter 3) is not the same as the allocatively efficient quantity (WHAT WE WANT or the quantity where MSB=MSC). Since one of the economic goals of government is to help the economy achieve efficiency, governments often get involved to correct for market failures. If the market produces too much (negative externalities cause allocative inefficiency because of an overallocation of resources) the government tries to get it to produce less. If the market produces too little (positive externalities and public goods causing allocative inefficiency resulting in an underallocation of resources) the government tries to get it to produce more.